If I were you, I'd have put ocamlc instead of ocamlopt.
----- Message d'origine ----
De : Raj Bandyopadhyay <rajb@rice.edu>
À : caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Envoyé le : Dimanche, 14 Octobre 2007, 15h14mn 49s
Objet : [Caml-list] OCaml on Windows help
Hi
I installed OCaml on Windows XP (the MSVC version, since I assume
that's faster than
the Cygwin version?). I'm having trouble compiling OCaml programs
from the command line and I wonder if it's a bug or just my lack of
Windows knowledge.
I created a sample program test.ml and
here's what happens
> ocamlopt -o test.exe test.ml
-----------
'ml' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file
Assembler error, input left in file....
-------------
Using ocamlc instead of ocamlopt seems to work fine, at least there are
no compilation errors.
Any suggestions on what I should do?
Thanks
Raj
_______________________________________________
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-listArchives:
http://caml.inria.frBeginner's list:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginnersBug reports:
http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs