From: Leo White <leo@lpw25.net>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Record fields not reexported from functors.
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 13:24:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1431365094.2461238.265829665.54F778D3@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPOA5_7X-wAxr8BwaUgz1u4rR00cphzgEKeQyPLwcNDT317NbQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2316 bytes --]
To expand slightly on Jacques' answer. Record fields (and variant
constructors) must be explicitly exported, using the:
type t = Foo.t = { bar : int }
syntax.
For example, the following version of your example works:
module type HasType = sig type t = { innerRecordField: int } end
module EchoModule (Input : HasType) : HasType with type t = Input.t =
struct type t = Input.t = {innerRecordField: int} end
module ClonedModuleWithRecordType = EchoModule(struct type t =
{innerRecordField: int} end)
let myRecord: ClonedModuleWithRecordType.t = {
ClonedModuleWithRecordType.innerRecordField=10; }
Of course, the `EchoModule` functor can now only operate on modules
where the type t is defined as:
type t = { innerRecordField : int }
Jacques' solution of giving the functor argument a name, and using that
name to access the field, is a much more flexible approach.
Regards,
Leo
On Sun, 10 May 2015, at 05:58 PM, Jordan W wrote:
> I believe there is an issue with record fields and functors. It
> appears that while types are correctly exported from functors, the
> corresponding record field scopes are not. Here is an example.
>
> module type HasType = sig type t end
>
> module EchoModule (Input:HasType): (HasType with type t = Input.t) =
> (struct type t = Input.t end)
>
> module ClonedModuleWithRecordType = EchoModule (struct type t =
> {innerRecordField: int} end)
>
> (* This doesn't type check, but I can't see why it shouldn't. Record
> fields' scopes should be reexported just like the types themselves.
>
> let myRecord: ClonedModuleWithRecordType.t = {
> ClonedModuleWithRecordType.innerRecordField=10; }
>
> In this case, the original "scope" of the record fields is "lost"
> because the record type was declared in an anonymous module
> expression. I believe that it *should* be "lost" as it is, but then
> reexported as an identical type in the module returned from the
> functor (identically because of the "with constraint").
>
> *)
>
> module ClonedModuleWithNonRecordType = EchoModule (struct type t =
> string list end)
>
> (* This typechecks perfectly fine! Evidence that types are reexported,
> but not the "scope" of record labels *) let myRecord:
> ClonedModuleWithNonRecordType.t = ["asdf"; "fff"]
>
>
> Is anyone aware of whether or not this issue is already being tracked?
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4263 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-11 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-10 21:58 Jordan W
2015-05-10 23:19 ` Jacques Garrigue
2015-05-11 17:24 ` Leo White [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1431365094.2461238.265829665.54F778D3@webmail.messagingengine.com \
--to=leo@lpw25.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).