Re: [Caml-list] [humor] OCaml hip-hop song

[Kevin Chen <kevin@kevinchen.co>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2748 bytes --]

This rap is glorious. What's the story behind it -- was it a planned
part of the lecture?

-Kevin


On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 10:57 PM, Nate Foster wrote:
> I thought folks might enjoy hearing a new OCaml and Jane Street Async
> themed song by MC FloCaml (also known as Jared Wong), as performed in
> the final lecture of Michael Clarkson's CS 3110 class this semester at
> Cornell.
>
> Enjoy, -N
>
> Video (by Neel Kapse): http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~jnfoster/flocaml.mp4
>
> Music (by Jared Wong): https://soundcloud.com/rangersbeats/flocaml
>
> Lyrics: Take big steps to eval, like a nomad Bind and return like a
> Monad Got you looking so mad about the signature I got you using in
> the directory with the MLI files the compiler was choosing
>
> The type checks out, I’m feeling greater Defer the value now and I
> return a little later Cuz I’m threaded, so for now I ain’t got much to
> say I put a semicolon on to throw the unit away
>
> At this point, I only know what you know that we know I fill up the
> Monad like it’s a burrito And I read it, I’m never defeated, bind and
> retrieve it with anonymous functions, so that I’m never gonna leave
> it behind
>
> And don’t worry, in case you haven’t heard I’m bout to Ivar.read it
> and put it up in a deferred Or I could ref it and bang it for an
> immutable copy And just a little later, you can call me A$YNC ROCKY
>
> Try to stop me, I wouldn’t care, I’d be ambivalent It’s the same game,
> behavioral equivalence And I don’t even think that you was all that
> Your scheduler was so lonely it couldn’t ever get a callback
>
> And really that’s the kind of thing that you couldn’t handle Because
> my double semicolons got them screaming OH CAML Side effects, catch
> them all, now you know we got ‘em All up in UTOP but I started on
> the bottom
>
> So please take a second and just listen (listen) Up in your speakers
> I’m wishin to write a weaker precondition Took a few small steps, I
> was feeling like a dope Now I’m up in OCaml, we using lexical scope
>
> But once again I need to try to understand this, All these pedantic
> antics tripping up my semantics I can stress, how much I really want
> to do it all But once it’s said I can’t take it back it’s immutable
>
> And there was only one course plan Turning twenty-one, going on 3110
> But really, at this moment, I’m still living in terror Because the
> type checker be giving me compile time errors
>
> The C A M L, with an O at the front It’s not imperative scaring ya,
> and we ain’t tryna stunt Just tryna process every single type to keep
> it in check And having higher-order fun with it is just a side effect

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3789 bytes --]