Re: [Caml-list] ctypes - to string or to bigarray?

[Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1071 bytes --]

Use bigarrays. There is one striking advantage: you need not to make a
copy when calling blocking I/O functions. With strings/bytes you need
to, because another thread could otherwise move the buffer while you are
reading/writing.

Gerd

Am Sonntag, den 28.02.2016, 19:15 +0000 schrieb Malcolm Matalka:
> I'm writing bindings for a library that is just doing I/O and wondering
> what the suggested best practice is around using string or bigarray.  It
> seems like using Bigarray is probably the most versatile interface.
> People can decide to do the copying themselves or just use Bigarray
> everywhere.
> 
> Are there any other things to consider?  Suggestions?
> 
> Thanks,
> /Malcolm
> 

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gerd Stolpmann, Darmstadt, Germany    gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de
My OCaml site:          http://www.camlcity.org
Contact details:        http://www.camlcity.org/contact.html
Company homepage:       http://www.gerd-stolpmann.de
------------------------------------------------------------


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]