Re: [Caml-list] Question about Lwt/Async

[Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 996 bytes --]

Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2016, 14:37 +0000 schrieb Malcolm Matalka:
> > Sorry for not being constructive. I don't like the approach (and I also
> > don't like Lwt and Async, and by the way these are not the only kids on
> > the block).
> 
> Definitely, I'd like more options, the hope is that an interface like
> this would provide a meeting point for the various libraries.

I'm very much in favor of this. However, earlier attempts were not so
successful, so my thinking that it is better to reduce this to the bare
minimum - the luxury could be defined elsewhere.

So why not simply focus on, say poll, read, write?

Gerd
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gerd Stolpmann, Darmstadt, Germany    gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de
My OCaml site:          http://www.camlcity.org
Contact details:        http://www.camlcity.org/contact.html
Company homepage:       http://www.gerd-stolpmann.de
------------------------------------------------------------


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]