Am Donnerstag, den 19.01.2017, 15:35 +0100 schrieb Alain Frisch:
> (Another argument in favor of the status quo is that writing 
> "FloatArray.get a i" is syntactically heavier than "a.(i)". 
> Interestingly, I don't feel that the ability to write polymorphic
> code 
> on arrays and apply it to (unboxed) float arrays is considered as a
> very 
> important property.)

Any chance that we get implicits?

Gerd

> -- Alain
> 
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gerd Stolpmann, Darmstadt, Germany    gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de
My OCaml site:          http://www.camlcity.org
Contact details:        http://www.camlcity.org/contact.html
Company homepage:       http://www.gerd-stolpmann.de
------------------------------------------------------------