From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id VAA26296 for caml-red; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 21:17:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA05224 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 01:35:18 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns.bagley.org (ns.bagley.org [216.30.46.2]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f070ZGb27873 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 01:35:17 +0100 (MET) Received: by ns.bagley.org (TRS/80 Mail Daemon, from userid 500) id 61F6FFC746; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 18:35:17 -0600 (CST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14935.47557.71086.427098@ns.bagley.org> Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 18:35:16 -0600 (CST) To: Stephane.Legrand@bigfoot.com Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: A good benchmark for Objective Caml From: Doug Bagley X-Face: "|NaWfYJ-]P="T#?R.9}QgGuFXUd@3vi[.E2q-;"NV3+k_y@zreL2w^ts0XPXtt9^9{uQ@.cu2GgUgK9@HXC\a}Rtah}0'eT~>or7[~Hd?;!\Bpo#"3w>0a0ft-MvvZ In-Reply-To: <20010105005600.E98130@sequoia.mondomaineamoi.megalo> References: <20010105005600.E98130@sequoia.mondomaineamoi.megalo> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.2 (beta37) "Pan" XEmacs Lucid Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr Stephane Legrand wrote: > Hello, > > As the author says "it's just for fun" but as Objective Caml wins, it > can't hurt : > > http://www.bagley.org/~doug/shootout/craps.shtml Lest people get the wrong impression, that particular page is very preliminary, and the entire project is a "work in progress". You might want to start from the project homepage: http://www.bagley.org/~doug/shootout/ I do find Ocaml to be very very fast, but one of the reasons Ocaml does so well is that I've been able to complete all of my 23 tests in it. I do expect C and C++ to give Ocaml a run for its money when I've completed all the tests in those languages. Cheers, Doug