From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id VAA23384; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 21:31:28 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA23380 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 21:31:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from smtp3.xs4all.nl (smtp3.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.132]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f2SJVLT23660 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 21:31:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from beertje.william.bogus (williamc.xs4all.nl [213.84.56.92]) by smtp3.xs4all.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA00566; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 21:31:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from williamc@localhost) by beertje.william.bogus (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id f2SJX7t21821; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 21:33:07 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: beertje.william.bogus: williamc set sender to williamc@paneris.org using -f From: William Chesters MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15042.15434.793035.641908@beertje.william.bogus> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 21:32:26 +0200 (CEST) To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why People Aren't Using OCAML? (was Haskell) In-Reply-To: <3AC12586.E96D150E@ozemail.com.au> References: <3AC12586.E96D150E@ozemail.com.au> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk John Max Skaller writes: > I am constantly stumbling over syntax: even when the underlying > principles are clear, it is hard to find the right syntax, and it > is even harder to comprehend which constructions are actually > supported by the compiler. My main source of information is postings > to this list. Strange, I never had that problem. Even coming back to ocaml intermittently from C++ I don't have to worry too much about the syntax of things ... ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr