From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA16536; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 22:02:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA16472 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 22:02:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from smtp7.xs4all.nl (smtp7.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.133]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f56K20L26116 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 22:02:00 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from beertje.william.bogus (williamc.xs4all.nl [213.84.56.92]) by smtp7.xs4all.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA15947; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 22:01:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from williamc@localhost) by beertje.william.bogus (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id f56K61021796; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 22:06:01 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: beertje.william.bogus: williamc set sender to williamc@paneris.org using -f From: William Chesters MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15134.36136.766030.251564@beertje.william.bogus> Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 22:06:00 +0200 (CEST) To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml complexity In-Reply-To: <3B1E8AA1.22B71FA5@ozemail.com.au> References: <20010606095041.A93623@caddr.com> <15134.34352.642598.605606@beertje.william.bogus> <3B1E8AA1.22B71FA5@ozemail.com.au> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk John Max Skaller writes: > The really BIG culture shift, in my opinion, > is something much simpler: syntax. I agree that's very significant. C++-style syntax with camlp4, anyone? :) ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr