From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA17744; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 10:52:38 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA17730 for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 10:52:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lachesis.inria.fr (lachesis.inria.fr [128.93.52.5]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f998qb520128; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 10:52:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from lefessan@localhost) by lachesis.inria.fr (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f998r1i10133; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 10:53:01 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: lachesis.inria.fr: lefessan set sender to fabrice.le_fessant@inria.fr using -f From: Fabrice Le Fessant MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15298.47853.151478.165091@lachesis.inria.fr> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 10:53:01 +0200 (CEST) To: Maxence Guesdon Cc: Francois.Pottier@inria.fr, caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: [Caml-announce] OCamldoc References: <3BC218CA.9060008@inria.fr> <20011009082648.A14690@pauillac.inria.fr> <3BC30DCA.2020602@inria.fr> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.1 Reply-To: fabrice.le_fessant@inria.fr Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk What about adding a special keyword in ocamldoc comments to indicate to which function the comment applies ? :) You could then get rid of the placement limitation. Another option would be to override the default behavior either by an option or a configuration file ! a+ - Fabrice ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr