From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA20105; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:52:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA19952 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:52:08 +0100 (MET) Received: from lachesis.inria.fr (lachesis.inria.fr [128.93.52.5]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g0S8q1H19433; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:52:01 +0100 (MET) Received: (from lefessan@localhost) by lachesis.inria.fr (8.11.3/8.11.3) id g0S8rJl32002; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:53:19 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: lachesis.inria.fr: lefessan set sender to fabrice.le_fessant@inria.fr using -f From: Fabrice Le Fessant MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15445.4473.918333.899918@lachesis.inria.fr> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:53:13 +0100 (CET) To: Jacques Garrigue Cc: alan.schmitt@inria.fr, caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] CDK support References: <3C5107ED.4030508@free.fr> <20020125201853.C1425@alan-schm1p> <20020126074015J.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.1 Reply-To: fabrice.le_fessant@inria.fr Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk I agree with you , the CDK needs to be more modular, and to use ocamldoc. I don't know for findlib, I had a very short look at it, and found that using my own tool was easier at the beginning. However, I have no time now for such big changes, I keep updating the CDK with new ocaml versions, but it's the more I can do these days. If you have patches for particular architectures, I can apply them on the distribution so it will be at least a little easier to use. Best regards, - Fabrice ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr