From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA04715; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:25:05 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA04711 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:25:04 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from kraid.nerim.net (kraid.nerim.net [62.4.16.95])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g6I8P3H27311
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:25:03 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from karryall.dnsalias.org (karryall.dnsalias.org [62.4.18.180])
	by kraid.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4BAD240E35; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:18:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by karryall.dnsalias.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id 509974D0293; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:25:00 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <15670.31580.140719.514440@karryall.dnsalias.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:25:00 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: "Yaron M. Minsky" <yminsky@CS.Cornell.EDU>
Cc: Michael Tucker <mtucker@eecs.harvard.edu>, caml-list@inria.fr
From: Olivier Andrieu <andrieu@ijm.jussieu.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Opaque pointers with camlidl
In-Reply-To: <1026958782.11081.13.camel@dragonfly.localdomain>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0207171759380.61599-100000@bowser.eecs.harvard.edu>
	<1026958782.11081.13.camel@dragonfly.localdomain>
X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.2.1
Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr
Precedence: bulk

 Yaron M. Minsky [ 17 July 2002] :
 > For what it's worth, I have written a small berkeley DB interface (for
 > version 3.3.11, the one found in RH 7.3), which I've attached to this
 > email. 

Hi, 

At the beginning, of your stub I noticed this :

static void finalize_caml_dbenv(value dbenv) { 
  CAMLparam1(dbenv);
  caml_dbenv_close_internal(dbenv); 
  CAMLreturn0;
}

I think it's not a good idea to use CAMLparam* in the finalisation
function. IIRC, the manual explicitly says not to.

-- 
	  Olivier
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners