From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA10738; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 17:12:05 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA10724 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 17:12:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from uranium.btinternet.com (uranium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.89]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g7JFC4D05815 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 17:12:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from host217-41-35-80.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.41.35.80] helo=beertje.william.bogus) by uranium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8) id 17goCJ-0004gu-00; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 16:12:03 +0100 Received: (from williamc@localhost) by beertje.william.bogus (8.11.6/8.11.6/SuSE Linux 0.5) id g7JFFQ202108; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 16:15:26 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: beertje.william.bogus: williamc set sender to williamc@paneris.org using -f From: William Chesters MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15713.2957.408348.119913@beertje.william.bogus> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 16:15:25 +0100 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] O'Caml vs C++: a little benchmark In-Reply-To: <20020819150201.B6276@pauillac.inria.fr> References: <200208181716.NAA10426@hickory.cc.columbia.edu> <15711.57520.125841.25102@beertje.william.bogus> <20020819150201.B6276@pauillac.inria.fr> X-Mailer: VM 6.95 under 21.4 (patch 4) "Artificial Intelligence" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Xavier Leroy writes: > > the compiler doesn't inline Array.fold_left, and hence not your > > anonymous "fun" either, because it doesn't inline anything between > > compilation units. > > Just for the record: ocamlopt does perform inlining across compilation > units (via the information stored in .cmx files). What it doesn't do, > however, is inlining and specialization of recursive function definitions. Thanks for correcting that misapprehension, and apologies for propagating it. (I did do some tests, a long time ago---did I just get it wrong, or is this a relatively recent feature??) ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners