From: Brian Rogoff <bpr@artisan.com>
To: Diego-Olivier.FERNANDEZ-PONS@cicrp.jussieu.fr
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: Polymorphic recursion 9Was Re: [Caml-list] Doubly-linked list)
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 08:48:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15715.46665.366229.38824@granite.artisan.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A32.3.95.1020821094217.35716C-100000@ibm1.cicrp.jussieu.fr>
Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons writes:
> I do not agree with your analysis since I really do not believe anyone
> could think that polymorphic recursion is useless.
Every feature in a programming language has to be evaluated in a large
context. There are lot's of useful features that OCaml doesn't have. Would
you add them all?
I never said polymorphic recursion was useless, and I'd like direct support
for it added, so your claim that my analysis suggests it's uselessness
indicates that I am communicating very badly. I'll just be quiet on this
topic.
> Your trick
Actually, Jacques Garrigue's trick
http://caml.inria.fr/archives/199809/msg00032.html
but I just noticed that OCaml 3.05 has the same first class polymorphism on
records and since there was no use of class features like dynamic binding
that a record dictionary is even better.
BTW, the Caml mailing list archive is a really great resource.
-- Brian
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-21 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-13 8:00 [Caml-list] Doubly-linked list Oleg
2002-08-13 8:54 ` Markus Mottl
2002-08-13 15:52 ` Oleg
2002-08-13 11:00 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2002-08-13 14:30 ` Oleg
2002-08-13 15:11 ` Anton Moscal
2002-08-13 16:12 ` Oleg
2002-08-13 17:16 ` Max Kirillov
2002-08-14 0:49 ` Max Kirillov
2002-08-13 18:23 ` Anton E. Moscal
2002-08-13 16:16 ` Brian Rogoff
2002-08-14 8:13 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2002-08-14 15:43 ` Brian Rogoff
2002-08-19 10:38 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2002-08-19 15:58 ` Polymorphic recursion 9Was Re: [Caml-list] Doubly-linked list) Brian Rogoff
2002-08-21 8:04 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2002-08-21 15:48 ` Brian Rogoff [this message]
2002-08-23 8:14 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2002-08-23 21:57 ` John Max Skaller
2002-08-27 13:00 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2002-08-28 14:50 ` John Max Skaller
2002-08-28 17:27 ` [Caml-list] FELIX (was: Polymorphic recursion) Oleg
2002-08-19 23:17 ` [Caml-list] Doubly-linked list james woodyatt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15715.46665.366229.38824@granite.artisan.com \
--to=bpr@artisan.com \
--cc=Diego-Olivier.FERNANDEZ-PONS@cicrp.jussieu.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).