From: "M E Leypold @ labnet" <leypold@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
To: Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com>
Cc: tom.hirschowitz@inria.fr, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] mixin modules paper and future?
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:11:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15725.62310.16647.701975@hod.void.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20020828121746.02985ce0@mail.d6.com>
Chris Hecker writes:
>
> >You're right, it is not at all planned for any future release. There
> >are too many open questions yet even to make any guess whether it will ever
> >find its way. But thanks for your interest!
>
> Hopefully you guys are actively working on solving the open
> problems. :) I think that this is an incredibly important feature for
> caml to make headway into large systems development.
Do you think so? I think 1 thing we can learn from Java, C, C++,
FORTRAN and COBOL is, that the only thing a language doesn't need to
"make headway into large systems development" is any smart mechanisms
for composing systems. That is to say: Success doesn't depend on
merit.
Regards -- Markus
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-29 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-27 3:33 Chris Hecker
2002-08-28 8:43 ` Tom Hirschowitz
2002-08-28 19:25 ` Chris Hecker
2002-08-29 10:11 ` M E Leypold @ labnet [this message]
2002-08-29 18:47 ` [Caml-list] objective caml and industry james woodyatt
2002-08-29 22:57 ` Michael Vanier
2002-08-29 23:52 ` james woodyatt
2002-08-30 13:13 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-08-30 23:23 ` Michael Vanier
2002-08-30 2:25 ` Chris Hecker
2002-08-30 18:14 ` Jonathan Coupe
2002-09-01 9:18 ` What kind of industry do you mean? (Was: [Caml-list] objective caml and industry) Mattias Waldau
2002-09-01 20:15 ` Markus Mottl
2002-09-01 21:10 ` [Caml-list] wxOCaml? Dave Mason
2002-09-02 6:23 ` [Caml-list] Re: What kind of industry do you mean? (Was: objective caml and industry) Michaël Grünewald
2002-09-02 12:43 ` What kind of industry do you mean? (Was: [Caml-list] " Alessandro Baretta
2002-09-02 22:58 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2002-09-03 6:58 ` [Caml-list] Re: An XML standard API? (was:What kind of industry do you mean?) Alessandro Baretta
2002-09-02 18:15 ` What kind of industry do you mean? (Was: [Caml-list] objective caml and industry) Oleg
2002-08-30 18:14 ` [Caml-list] objective caml and industry Jonathan Coupe
2002-08-31 2:26 ` John Max Skaller
2002-09-02 18:38 ` Oleg
2002-08-30 2:21 ` [Caml-list] mixin modules paper and future? Chris Hecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15725.62310.16647.701975@hod.void.org \
--to=leypold@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=checker@d6.com \
--cc=tom.hirschowitz@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).