From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id VAA02014; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:24:59 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA03456 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:24:58 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mallaury.noc.nerim.net (smtp-101-monday.noc.nerim.net [62.4.17.101]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h9KJOv123695 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:24:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from karryall.dnsalias.org (karryall.dnsalias.org [62.4.18.180]) by mallaury.noc.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7169262DBB; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:24:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: by karryall.dnsalias.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 74B761A08F8; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:24:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Olivier Andrieu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16276.13955.227905.779639@karryall.dnsalias.org> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:24:51 +0200 To: gregoire.henry@pps.jussieu.fr Cc: Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ipv6, any news? In-Reply-To: <40848.134.157.116.130.1066668601.squirrel@webmail.zeuxis.net> References: <20031020151129.B13138@pauillac.inria.fr> <40848.134.157.116.130.1066668601.squirrel@webmail.zeuxis.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under Emacs 21.2.1 X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; andrieu:01 oandrieu:01 caml-list:01 gregoire:01 3.06.:01 feedbacks:01 oandrieu:01 reuse:01 sockaddr:01 nerim:01 nerim:01 ocaml:01 ocaml-:01 sockets:01 olivier:02 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Gregoire HENRY [Monday 20 October 2003] : > > Hello, > > I've make some works this summer, trying to respect basic sockets RFC. > It's based on Unix module from ocaml-3.06. > > http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~henry/ip6/socket6-20031020.tgz > > it's early works, but feedbacks would be nice. I did some of this too : http://oandrieu.nerim.net/ocaml/#ipv6 . I noticed you used a inet6_addr type for addresses. It's possible to reuse the inet_addr type and have the C code discriminate between the two by the string length. That way the sockaddr type wouldn't need to be extended. But then you can't specify the flowinfo field (and I don't know how to support it in this case). -- Olivier ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners