From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA17918; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 12:34:36 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA18762 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 12:34:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lri.lri.fr (lri.lri.fr [129.175.15.1]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i89AYZlB023878 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Sep 2004 12:34:35 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lri.lri.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B2F19E82D; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 12:34:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lri.lri.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lri.lri.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08563-06; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 12:34:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pc8-123 (pc8-123 [129.175.8.123]) by lri.lri.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0672919E80B; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 12:34:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from filliatr by pc8-123 with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C5MGA-0001YC-00; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 12:34:34 +0200 From: Jean-Christophe Filliatre MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16704.12730.731980.380265@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 12:34:34 +0200 To: Damien Doligez Cc: caml users Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Gripes with array In-Reply-To: References: <200409090310.29295.jon@jdh30.plus.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under Emacs 20.7.2 Reply-To: Jean-Christophe.Filliatre@lri.fr (Jean-Christophe Filliatre) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at lri.fr X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 414031BB.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; filliatre:01 filliatre:01 lri:01 caml-list:01 damien:01 stupid:01 doligez:01 writes:01 array:04 array:04 element:11 ridiculous:13 agree:14 stored:14 instead:15 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Damien Doligez writes: > > > But I must agree with you: this is definitely too small and we could > > imagine that, when the tag says a block is an array, the size is > > stored within the first (or the last) field instead. > > The last, really? How stupid I am! I was thinking of not adding an extra addition to the array access, keeping the first array element at field 0 but it is of course ridiculous. -- Jean-Christophe ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners