From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2C5BC84 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:55:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j3K6trWh027793 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:55:53 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA07156 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:55:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ext.lri.fr (ext.lri.fr [129.175.15.4]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j3K6tqZL027892 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:55:52 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ext.lri.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898C219E6E6; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:55:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ext.lri.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext.lri.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00591-07; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:55:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.lri.fr (serveur3-5 [129.175.3.5]) by ext.lri.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C3419E62B; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:55:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pc8-142 (pc9-152 [129.175.9.152]) by smtp.lri.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D98CED98; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:55:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from filliatr by pc8-142 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DO97n-0006cV-00; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:55:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <16997.64759.633065.777828@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:55:51 +0200 To: Gerd Stolpmann Cc: Christophe TROESTLER , stein@eecs.harvard.edu, hamburg@fas.harvard.edu, caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: Common CGI interface (was: [Caml-list] CamlGI question) In-Reply-To: <1113940495.6248.101.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <810e04dc0f6bb601fb828db8d18def6c@fas.harvard.edu> <20050419.133304.40952590.debian00@tiscali.be> <20050419084526.Q20372@bowser.eecs.harvard.edu> <20050419.210334.63756712.debian00@tiscali.be> <1113940495.6248.101.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: VM 7.18 under Emacs 21.3.1 From: Jean-Christophe Filliatre X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at lri.fr X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4265FCF9.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4265FCF8.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 filliatre:01 filliatre:01 lri:01 gerd:01 stolpmann:01 rauglaudre:01 ocamlnet:01 ocamlnet:01 lri:01 filliatr:01 wrote:01 writes:01 clarify:02 limitations:02 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: Gerd Stolpmann writes: > > I am quite astonished at seeing that many CGI implementations. I only > knew the implementation of de Rauglaudre and Filliatre, and its > limitations were one the motivations to develop Ocamlnet. Just to clarify the situation (if needed): I wrote my CGI library for my own purposes and it is not intended to be complete, RFC-compliant, or whatever. Even if it appears in the hump (by the time I put it online there were not so many such libraries), it does not make much sense to compare it today with libraries such as ocamlnet. -- Jean-Christophe Filliātre (http://www.lri.fr/~filliatr)