caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean-Christophe Filliatre <filliatr@lri.fr>
To: EEK Cooper <s0567141@sms.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Map.fold behavior changed
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:43:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17406.61821.450737.625981@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060224112209.51szurk2dc00oggg@www.sms.ed.ac.uk>


EEK Cooper writes:
 > 
 > My team just noticed that the behavior of Map.fold changed in OCaml 
 > version 3.08.4.
 > 
 > I'm concerned that the OCaml team would change the behavior of a 
 > library function so late in its life. I understand that it was thought 
 > to be "wrong" <http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=3607>, but 
 > changing the behavior of an existing function breaks existing apps and 
 > shouldn't be done lightly. 

I must agree  with you since we also  got a similar bug in  one of our
apps due to this Map.fold _implementation_ change.

However, we must also admit  that we were using an unspecified feature
of the  standard library. If  I remember correctly,  the documentation
was saying that  the traversal order was left  _unspecified_.  The new
version   of  Map.fold   simply  has   a  stronger,   but  consistent,
specification.  From this point of view, the Ocaml team thus cannot be
blamed.

You (and I) were using  the _implementation_ as a specification, which
is bad :-)

-- 
Jean-Christophe Filliâtre (http://www.lri.fr/~filliatr)


  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-24 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-24 11:22 EEK Cooper
2006-02-24 11:43 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre [this message]
2006-02-24 13:29   ` [Caml-list] " EEK Cooper
2006-02-24 13:44     ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2006-02-24 14:13     ` Damien Doligez
2006-02-24 15:43       ` Brian Hurt
2006-02-24 16:20         ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2006-02-24 16:01       ` Joaquin Cuenca Abela
2006-02-27 12:59         ` Damien Doligez
2006-03-02 13:57           ` Ezra Cooper
2006-03-03 15:41             ` N. Owen Gunden
2006-03-09  7:14               ` Florian Hars
2006-03-13 16:31                 ` Damien Doligez
2006-03-15  7:27                   ` Florian Hars
2006-03-15  7:37                     ` Jon Harrop
2006-03-15  7:40                     ` Alain Frisch
2006-03-15  8:41                       ` Florian Hars
2006-03-15 21:18                         ` Christophe Raffalli
2006-02-24 15:31 ` Brian Hurt
2006-03-01  5:20 ` Nathaniel Gray
2006-03-01  9:33   ` Nicolas Pouillard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17406.61821.450737.625981@gargle.gargle.HOWL \
    --to=filliatr@lri.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    --cc=s0567141@sms.ed.ac.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).