From: Jean-Christophe Filliatre <filliatr@lri.fr>
To: EEK Cooper <s0567141@sms.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Map.fold behavior changed
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:44:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17407.3494.29948.382697@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060224132950.7l49sm2akg0sskkw@www.sms.ed.ac.uk>
EEK Cooper writes:
> I'm glad to hear that others are facing this problem as well. Those of
> you who are: how are you dealing with it? Are you simply requiring your
> users to use a particular version of the compiler? Or switching on
> Sys.ocaml_version?
When we discovered the bug, we first used a test of ocaml's version at
configuration time and a preprocessing using camlp4's pa_ifdef module
to select the right order relation according to ocaml's version (our
initial order relation or the inverse relation, to get the same
behavior as before with the new Map.fold).
But this was not very satisfactory, and we finally rewrote our code to
be independent of Map.fold implementation (and we got rid of camlp4
preprocessing, which simplified our Makefile).
--
Jean-Christophe Filliâtre (http://www.lri.fr/~filliatr)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-24 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-24 11:22 EEK Cooper
2006-02-24 11:43 ` [Caml-list] " Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2006-02-24 13:29 ` EEK Cooper
2006-02-24 13:44 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre [this message]
2006-02-24 14:13 ` Damien Doligez
2006-02-24 15:43 ` Brian Hurt
2006-02-24 16:20 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2006-02-24 16:01 ` Joaquin Cuenca Abela
2006-02-27 12:59 ` Damien Doligez
2006-03-02 13:57 ` Ezra Cooper
2006-03-03 15:41 ` N. Owen Gunden
2006-03-09 7:14 ` Florian Hars
2006-03-13 16:31 ` Damien Doligez
2006-03-15 7:27 ` Florian Hars
2006-03-15 7:37 ` Jon Harrop
2006-03-15 7:40 ` Alain Frisch
2006-03-15 8:41 ` Florian Hars
2006-03-15 21:18 ` Christophe Raffalli
2006-02-24 15:31 ` Brian Hurt
2006-03-01 5:20 ` Nathaniel Gray
2006-03-01 9:33 ` Nicolas Pouillard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17407.3494.29948.382697@gargle.gargle.HOWL \
--to=filliatr@lri.fr \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=s0567141@sms.ed.ac.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).