From: "Daniel Bünzli" <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: Dmitry Grebeniuk <gdsfh1@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Syntax extensions without Camlp4
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 16:30:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17746B364433484593CBA5C5BF900FC2@erratique.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPi0vKVivCUT7YKtca6W7HtXyTYOzsdQrKh6KpyXBuWiJUbjng@mail.gmail.com>
Le jeudi, 31 mai 2012 à 15:21, Dmitry Grebeniuk a écrit :
> But how will people otherwise discover the beauty of
> revised syntax if camlp4 will accept original syntax?
It could have been beautiful if the dev team had gradually forced us to transition to it. Having not, it should be considered inexistant in my opinion. It just brings more confusion and fragmentation around the OCaml system.
I don't have problems with OCaml's lack of popularity, but still let's try not to make it totally irrelevant by having at least two different syntaxes for it.
Best,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-31 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-27 15:06 [Caml-list] " Alexandre Pilkiewicz
2012-05-27 16:53 ` [Caml-list] " Hongbo Zhang
2012-05-27 18:04 ` Daniel Bünzli
2012-05-27 18:18 ` Hongbo Zhang
2012-05-27 19:01 ` Daniel Bünzli
2012-05-27 22:43 ` Wojciech Meyer
2012-05-28 9:35 ` Daniel Bünzli
2012-05-28 9:59 ` Gabriel Scherer
2012-05-30 14:45 ` Hongbo Zhang
2012-05-28 11:17 ` Wojciech Meyer
2012-05-28 15:52 ` Jeffrey Scofield
2012-05-27 18:19 ` Hongbo Zhang
2012-05-28 8:17 ` Paolo Donadeo
2012-05-30 12:41 ` Alain Frisch
2012-05-30 13:18 ` Markus Mottl
2012-05-30 13:37 ` Dan Bensen
2012-05-30 14:16 ` Hongbo Zhang
2012-05-30 14:23 ` Paolo Donadeo
[not found] ` <20120531081913.GA26742@securactive.lan>
2012-05-31 12:26 ` Paolo Donadeo
2012-05-31 12:38 ` Anil Madhavapeddy
2012-05-31 12:40 ` Anil Madhavapeddy
2012-05-31 12:46 ` Yaron Minsky
2012-05-31 12:47 ` Gabriel Scherer
2012-05-31 22:08 ` Paolo Donadeo
2012-05-30 14:14 ` Hongbo Zhang
2012-05-31 12:59 ` Alain Frisch
2012-05-31 13:21 ` Dmitry Grebeniuk
2012-05-31 14:30 ` Daniel Bünzli [this message]
2012-05-31 16:01 ` bob zhang
2012-05-31 17:28 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2012-05-31 18:03 ` Wojciech Meyer
2012-05-31 18:32 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2012-05-31 18:32 ` Hongbo Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17746B364433484593CBA5C5BF900FC2@erratique.ch \
--to=daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=gdsfh1@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).