From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: weis
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA06389 for caml-redistribution; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 14:58:16 +0100 (MET)
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA25522 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 11:35:55 +0100 (MET)
Received: from capa.inria.fr (coscoy@capa.inria.fr [138.96.24.3]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA22378 for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 11:35:53 +0100 (MET)
Received: by capa.inria.fr (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA04724; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 11:35:48 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <199701291035.LAA04724@capa.inria.fr>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.7 5/3/96
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Alias and Tuple patterns
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 11:35:47 +0100
From: Yann Coscoy <Yann.Coscoy@sophia.inria.fr>
Sender: weis


(************************ french *********************************)

Il y a un comportement du parser que je trouve plutot bizarre :

(<pat1>, <pat2> as a, <pat3>)

est lu comme :

(((<pat1>, <pat2>) as a), <pat3>).

Je m'attendrais plutot a  :

(<pat1>,(<pat2> as a),<pat3>).

   Yann Coscoy


(*************************** english *******************************)

The parser has a stange behaviour :

(<pat1>, <pat2> as a, <pat3>)

is understood as :

(((<pat1>, <pat2>) as a), <pat3>).

I was expecting :

(<pat1>,(<pat2> as a),<pat3>).

   Yann Coscoy