caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* (O)caml and Java
@ 1997-01-29  5:58 Frank Christoph
  1997-01-29 15:05 ` Fritz Heinrichmeyer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Frank Christoph @ 1997-01-29  5:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: caml-list

  I certainly don't want to make a big issue out of it, but the question is
begging to be asked. :) Has anyone ever compared the time performance of
interpreted (O)caml and Java, or (O)caml/Tk and Java+AWT?  I expect no one has
translated a test suite into both languages, but it would be amusing even to
hear informal accounts...

-- 
Frank Christoph                 Next Solution Co.      Tel: 0424-98-1811
christo@nextsolution.co.jp                             Fax: 0424-98-1500





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: (O)caml and Java
  1997-01-29  5:58 (O)caml and Java Frank Christoph
@ 1997-01-29 15:05 ` Fritz Heinrichmeyer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Fritz Heinrichmeyer @ 1997-01-29 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: christo; +Cc: caml-list

Some month ago i compared some simple programs:

ocaml bytecompiled seems to be remarkable faster than byte compiled
java.

MMM-applets are remarkable faster than JAVA awt-applets.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: (O)caml and Java
  1997-02-05 20:07 David Gurr
@ 1997-02-06  6:53 ` Fritz Heinrichmeyer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Fritz Heinrichmeyer @ 1997-02-06  6:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gurr; +Cc: fritz.heinrichmeyer, caml-list

I used the JDK-1.02 and gcc-2.7.1





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: (O)caml and Java
@ 1997-02-05 20:07 David Gurr
  1997-02-06  6:53 ` Fritz Heinrichmeyer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Gurr @ 1997-02-05 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: fritz.heinrichmeyer; +Cc: caml-list


> From Pierre.Weis@inria.fr Wed Jan 29 10:30:17 1997
> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 16:05:28 +0100
> From: Fritz Heinrichmeyer <fritz.heinrichmeyer@fernuni-hagen.de>
> To: christo@nextsolution.co.jp
> Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
> Subject: Re: (O)caml and Java
> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.94)
> 
> Some month ago i compared some simple programs:
> 
> ocaml bytecompiled seems to be remarkable faster than byte compiled
> java.
> 
> MMM-applets are remarkable faster than JAVA awt-applets.
> 
Since there are numerous Java implementations and some of the
most common are the slowest, it would help if you said what
implementations you were compareing and what C compiler you
used as well. -D





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~1997-02-06 15:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1997-01-29  5:58 (O)caml and Java Frank Christoph
1997-01-29 15:05 ` Fritz Heinrichmeyer
1997-02-05 20:07 David Gurr
1997-02-06  6:53 ` Fritz Heinrichmeyer

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).