From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: weis
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id PAA03414 for caml-redistribution; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 15:11:45 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA15124 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Sat, 22 Aug 1998 12:35:37 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from arthur.u-strasbg.fr (arthur.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.75.24])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA15949
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sat, 22 Aug 1998 12:35:35 +0200 (MET DST)
From: boos@arthur.u-strasbg.fr
Received: (from boos@localhost)
	by arthur.u-strasbg.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA01693;
	Sat, 22 Aug 1998 12:38:43 +0200
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 12:38:43 +0200
Message-Id: <199808221038.MAA01693@arthur.u-strasbg.fr>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Bug/Feature]: (#meth) syntax is gone ?
Sender: weis


Hello, 

I realize that this feature was never
documented in the reference manual (at least not in version 1.07).
But it was quite usefull for me, the main usage for it being :

  List.iter (#meth) [ obj1; obj2; obj3 ]

instead of the following :

  List.iter (fun o -> o#meth) [ obj1; obj2; obj3 ]


Will this be avaible again in the future, 
or should I start fixing my sources (or patching parser.mly :) ?


-- Christian