From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: weis
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA07170 for caml-redistribution; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 16:33:03 +0100 (MET)
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA13228 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 15:57:05 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mail4.svr.pol.co.uk (mail4.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.193.211])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA18304
	for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 15:57:03 +0100 (MET)
Received: from modem-100.erythromycin.dialup.pol.co.uk
	([62.136.65.228] helo=toy.william.bogus ident=williamc)
	by mail4.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1)
	id 1005Fd-00026y-00
	for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 14:57:02 +0000
Received: (from williamc@localhost)
	by toy.william.bogus (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA00641;
	Tue, 12 Jan 1999 11:49:15 GMT
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 11:49:15 GMT
Message-Id: <199901121149.LAA00641@toy.william.bogus>
From: William Chesters <williamc@dai.ed.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr
Subject: Re: Map is not tail recursive
In-Reply-To: <19990111120358.25340@pauillac.inria.fr>
References: <369885D1.1C8A1269@ind-cr.uclm.es>
	<19990111120358.25340@pauillac.inria.fr>
X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under Emacs 20.2.1
Sender: weis

Xavier Leroy writes:
 > I would also contend that if your program routinely manipulate
 > 100000-element lists, then you're probably using the wrong data
 > structure anyway.  But that's a different issue.

Good, I was hoping you would say that!  Just because things are
traditionally done in a certain way in FP textbooks doesn't mean it
actually makes sense to do them that way in real life.

People hardly ever use linked lists in C++ or Java, and the reasons
why mostly hold good in ocaml.

However, implementing a polymorphic `vector' (resizable array) in
ocaml requires a small amount of fancy footwork because of the lack of
a universal `null' value ... there might be a case for implementing
this as part of the underlying language.


French-like paraphrase:

Les livres sur PF utilises exclusivement la linked list, mai pour la
plupart des applications cette structure n'est pas la plus efficiente.
Alors on ne l'utilise presque point en C++ ou Java.  Mais ce n'est pas
100% facile =E1 faire une type `vector' en ocaml, parce ce que ocaml
manque un valeur "null".