From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: weis
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA01153 for caml-redistribution@pauillac.inria.fr; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 17:34:25 +0100 (MET)
Resent-Message-Id: <199911081634.RAA01153@pauillac.inria.fr>
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA14989 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 13:59:53 +0100 (MET)
Received: from tobago.inria.fr (tobago.inria.fr [128.93.8.21])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA02996
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 13:59:51 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from doligez@localhost) by tobago.inria.fr (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA18959 for caml-list@inria.fr; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 13:59:49 +0100
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 13:59:49 +0100
From: Damien Doligez <Damien.Doligez@inria.fr>
Message-Id: <199911081259.NAA18959@tobago.inria.fr>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re:  GC time
Resent-From: weis@pauillac.inria.fr
Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 17:34:25 +0100
Resent-To: caml-redistribution@pauillac.inria.fr

>From: Hongwei Xi <hwxi@ececs.uc.edu>

>It there a (simple) way for me to measure the GC time
>spent on executing ocamlopt-generated native code or
>ocaml bytecode?

Not yet.  We may include GC timers in a future release of O'Caml, but
starting and stopping the timer takes almost as much time as the GC
itself, so you'll take a performance hit and the accuracy of the
timings will not be very good.

-- Damien