From: Markus Mottl <mottl@miss.wu-wien.ac.at>
To: Damien.Doligez@inria.fr (Damien Doligez)
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr (OCAML)
Subject: Re: GC time
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 18:54:36 +0100 (MET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199911081754.SAA22185@miss.wu-wien.ac.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <199911081259.NAA18959@tobago.inria.fr> from "Damien Doligez" at Nov 8, 99 01:59:49 pm
> >It there a (simple) way for me to measure the GC time
> >spent on executing ocamlopt-generated native code or
> >ocaml bytecode?
>
> Not yet. We may include GC timers in a future release of O'Caml, but
> starting and stopping the timer takes almost as much time as the GC
> itself, so you'll take a performance hit and the accuracy of the
> timings will not be very good.
It is possible to do an exact (cycle level) analysis on Alpha-processors
under Digitial Unix. The tool "pixie" allows insertion of profiling code
into any kind of binary executable. The resulting information is extremely
detailed and also accurately counts cycles consumed by the OCaml-GC. So if
you have access to such a machine, profiling gets easy...
Here, for example, the first lines of output of such a run:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2297470 cycles (0.0077 seconds at 299.40 megahertz)
cycles %cycles cum % seconds cycles bytes procedure (file)
/call /line
380979 16.58 16.58 0.0013 62 ? oldify (<sm>)
315953 13.75 30.33 0.0011 45 ? Stream_get_data_66 (<sm>)
192558 8.38 38.72 0.0006 192558 ? proc_at_0x12004f080 (<sm>)
152879 6.65 45.37 0.0005 454 ? lex_engine (<sm>)
152832 6.65 52.02 0.0005 159 ? parse_engine (<sm>)
111860 4.87 56.89 0.0004 47 ? alloc_shr (<sm>)
106617 4.64 61.53 0.0004 36 ? modify (<sm>)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regards,
Markus Mottl
--
Markus Mottl, mottl@miss.wu-wien.ac.at, http://miss.wu-wien.ac.at/~mottl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-11-08 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-11-08 12:59 Damien Doligez
1999-11-08 17:54 ` Markus Mottl [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-10-26 17:31 assembly Xavier Leroy
1999-10-29 4:21 ` GC time Hongwei Xi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=199911081754.SAA22185@miss.wu-wien.ac.at \
--to=mottl@miss.wu-wien.ac.at \
--cc=Damien.Doligez@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).