From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: weis
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id PAA28005 for caml-redistribution; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 15:18:25 +0100 (MET)
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA32390 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 14:55:30 +0100 (MET)
Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA16460
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 14:55:28 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from xleroy@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA16710; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 14:55:29 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <19991123145529.02899@pauillac.inria.fr>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 14:55:29 +0100
From: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: bugs in OCaml 2.03
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1
Sender: weis

Despite OCaml 2.03 being intended as a bug-fix release, we managed to
introduce two relatively serious bugs (one in the OCaml-C interface
and one in the bytecode compiler with the -g option on), which didn't
show up in our tests.

As a consequence, there will be a 2.04 release very soon (by the end
of this week).

If you've already installed 2.03 and hit any serious problem, please
report it to us (caml-light@inria.fr) as soon as possible, so that we
can try to address critical bugs before 2.04 is out.

Thanks for your help and apologies for the inconvenience.

- Xavier Leroy