From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E69BBB81 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:12:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from [128.93.8.130] (macadam.inria.fr [128.93.8.130]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k1OECd0A018255 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:12:39 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <20060224132950.7l49sm2akg0sskkw@www.sms.ed.ac.uk> References: <20060224112209.51szurk2dc00oggg@www.sms.ed.ac.uk> <17406.61821.450737.625981@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20060224132950.7l49sm2akg0sskkw@www.sms.ed.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <1AEDE2F4-2D83-416F-AFDC-7ECAF892BFBD@inria.fr> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Damien Doligez Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Map.fold behavior changed Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:13:14 +0100 To: caml-list X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 43FF1457.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; damien:01 damien:01 caml-list:01 unspecified:01 wrote:01 doligez:01 doligez:01 typo:03 inria:05 fold:06 feb:09 documented:09 reasonable:10 reasonable:10 think:11 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Feb 24, 2006, at 14:29, EEK Cooper wrote: > Since the behavior was NOT unspecified, it was reasonable to assume > that the > documentation suffered from a simple typo, and to expect the > behavior not to > change. "It is documented to do something else, so we will assume that it's intended to do what it does, instead of what the documentation says." I don't think this is very reasonable. -- Damien