From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D91A97FCEF for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 14:11:57 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AuAQBamjNVnEpWN0pch1HKfgKBWxABAQEBAQEBEQEBAQEBBg0JCRQuhCEBAQQjVhALDgwCJgICRxAGG4gjBLQblAwBCgEBAR6BIYoWhFEzB4JoL4EWAQSca4V4D4oug06CWYE+gzEBAQE X-IPAS-Result: A0AuAQBamjNVnEpWN0pch1HKfgKBWxABAQEBAQEBEQEBAQEBBg0JCRQuhCEBAQQjVhALDgwCJgICRxAGG4gjBLQblAwBCgEBAR6BIYoWhFEzB4JoL4EWAQSca4V4D4oug06CWYE+gzEBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,603,1422918000"; d="scan'208";a="135757421" Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 19 Apr 2015 14:11:57 +0200 Received: from [172.20.10.2] (121.232.197.178.dynamic.wless.lssmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch [178.197.232.121]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7629E20EA956; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 12:11:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 14:11:48 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= To: David Allsopp Cc: Adrien Nader , Malcolm Matalka , "=?utf-8?Q?caml-list=40inria.fr?=" Message-ID: <1C4B8D903341432CB5D1CAF025C3814F@erratique.ch> In-Reply-To: References: <877ftfoudd.fsf@gmail.com> <20150419064722.GA25301@notk.org> <67E83AEE021C4CF3826AA7A3575C5635@erratique.ch> X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Suggested way to determine platform specific capabilities in build system? Le dimanche, 19 avril 2015 =C3=A0 12:13, David Allsopp a =C3=A9crit : > > I know this is the way autocrap likes to work; it may seem smart but I > > think that's completely retarded. >=20=20 > Um, while your arguments often veer a little towards ad hominem attacks, = the word "retarded" used in this context is extremely offensive, even if th= at is not what you intended (making allowance that while your English is ex= tremely good, it is not your first language). I don't see any ad hominem attack here I'm criticizing tools and approaches= =E2=80=94 if Adrien think there is one, I'm sorry and tell him he should n= ot take it as such. Regarding the sentence you mention I'll rephrase it just for you (or any ot= her person I may have offended): =E2=9D=80 I know this is the way autoheaven likes to work, however it seems= that while I can appreciate that this technique has his merits I do have s= light concerns with it. =E2=9D=80 Best, Daniel