* camlp4 vs SYB in Haskell
@ 2007-05-27 11:49 Joel Reymont
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Joel Reymont @ 2007-05-27 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: OCaml List
Folks, I just posted a review of my experience developing a compiler
from a trading language into C# [1]. One thing I compare is the Scrap
Your Boilerplate approach in Haskell [2] vs fold generators in camlp4.
I received the following comment in response:
"Also, can you elaborate on the semantic consequences of using
strongly typed SYB traversals on the Haskell side, versus macro/token
stuff on the OCaml side? Aren't they wildly different techniques?"
I'll be looking into what Nicolas does with the camlp4 generators but
would also appreciate suggestions on how to properly answer this
challenge.
Thanks, Joel
[1] http://wagerlabs.com/2007/5/26/who-let-the-dogs-out
[2] http://www.cs.vu.nl/boilerplate/
--
http://topdog.cc/ - EL to C# compiler
http://wagerlabs.com/ - blog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-05-27 11:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-27 11:49 camlp4 vs SYB in Haskell Joel Reymont
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).