From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: weis Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA24531 for caml-redistribution; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 12:08:06 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA03402 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 12:03:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA28220; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 12:03:21 +0100 (MET) Received: (from xleroy@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA03793; Tue, 4 Jan 2000 12:03:20 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <20000104120320.21969@pauillac.inria.fr> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 12:03:20 +0100 From: Xavier Leroy To: Steve Stevenson , caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: Support for #line? References: <14444.54874.182356.608221@merlin.cs.clemson.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1 In-Reply-To: <14444.54874.182356.608221@merlin.cs.clemson.edu>; from Steve Stevenson on Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 11:15:53AM -0500 Sender: weis > Is there support for #line type constructs to help in using > preprocessors? Yes. The syntax is "# LINENO" or "# LINENO FILENAME". We used to support "#line LINENO" as an alias for "# LINENO" until Georges Gonthier pointed out a nasty ambiguity with the invocation of a method called "line"... - Xavier Leroy