From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: weis Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA30843 for caml-redistribution; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 17:26:07 +0100 (MET) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA22685 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 23:35:37 +0100 (MET) Received: from wally.eecs.harvard.edu (wally.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.30]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA13640; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 23:35:34 +0100 (MET) Received: from wally.eecs.harvard.edu (wally.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.30]) by wally.eecs.harvard.edu (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id RAA15639; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 17:35:34 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200001122235.RAA15639@wally.eecs.harvard.edu> To: Pierre Weis cc: ohl@hep.tu-darmstadt.de, caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: Immutable arrays (modest Feature request) In-Reply-To: Message from Pierre Weis of "Wed, 12 Jan 0100 23:06:35 +0100." <200001122206.XAA21693@pauillac.inria.fr> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 17:35:33 -0500 From: Norman Ramsey Sender: weis I would have used immutable strings in my last Caml program had they been available. I would like vectors as well (though I confess I use them rarely). N