From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: weis Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA09867 for caml-redistribution; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 17:29:52 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA02931 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:47:36 +0100 (MET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA20587; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:47:28 +0100 (MET) Received: (from xleroy@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA18172; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:47:27 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <20000113104727.17845@pauillac.inria.fr> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:47:27 +0100 From: Xavier Leroy To: dsl@tepkom.ru, caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: Byte-code specs. References: <3871F772.E37F9955@tepkom.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1 In-Reply-To: <3871F772.E37F9955@tepkom.ru>; from Dmitri Lomov on Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 04:36:50PM +0300 Sender: weis > Are there any specs for CAML bytecode? Not much. There is an old technical report (1990!) that documents the Caml Light virtual machine in some details: http://pauillac.inria.fr/~xleroy/publi/ZINC.ps.gz The Objective Caml virtual machine is a second iteration of the Caml Light VM, with some complications removed (e.g. one stack instead of two). However, there is no paper spec for it. - Xavier Leroy