From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: weis
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id IAA21010 for caml-redistribution; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 08:48:35 +0100 (MET)
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA23546 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:45:04 +0100 (MET)
Received: from sunlight.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (sunlight.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.11.7])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA17635
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:45:03 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from pfitzen@localhost)
	by sunlight.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id UAA00907
	for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:45:01 +0100 (MET)
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:45:01 +0100 (MET)
From: Juergen Pfitzenmaier <pfitzen@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Message-Id: <200001131945.UAA00907@sunlight.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: Immutable arrays (modest Feature request)
Sender: weis

I too would like to see immutable strings/arrays if they are faster than
their mutable siblings.

pfitzen