* LablTk not in MS Windows O'Caml 2.99?
@ 2000-01-13 0:08 T. Kurt Bond
2000-01-14 2:39 ` Jacques Garrigue
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: T. Kurt Bond @ 2000-01-13 0:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
[I apologize for the lack of a French version of this message.]
Hello!
It looks like the precompiled binaries for O'Caml 2.99 for MS Windows
don't include LablTk, although the Redhat binaries did include
LablTk. Earlier versions of O'Caml for MS Windows included O'CamlTk.
Was this omission intentional?
Result of not enough manpower?
Has anyone gotten LablTk to work on MS Windows?
Is the TK interface eventually going to be replaced by a Gtk+ interface?
Has anyone gotten LablGtk to work on MS Windows?
Does all of this depend more people helping with O'Caml development?
(:-)
--
T. Kurt Bond, tkb@access.mountain.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: LablTk not in MS Windows O'Caml 2.99?
2000-01-13 0:08 LablTk not in MS Windows O'Caml 2.99? T. Kurt Bond
@ 2000-01-14 2:39 ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-01-14 8:47 ` Sven LUTHER
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jacques Garrigue @ 2000-01-14 2:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tkb; +Cc: caml-list
From: "T. Kurt Bond" <tkb@access.mountain.net>
> It looks like the precompiled binaries for O'Caml 2.99 for MS Windows
> don't include LablTk, although the Redhat binaries did include
> LablTk. Earlier versions of O'Caml for MS Windows included O'CamlTk.
LablTk is not O'CamlTk, which explains this lack.
Applications written for O'CamlTk will not work with it, and you
should get and compile O'CamlTK for them.
I plan to include LablTk in the windows version of ocaml 3.00.
> Is the TK interface eventually going to be replaced by a Gtk+ interface?
> Has anyone gotten LablGtk to work on MS Windows?
LablGTK is still beta, so do not expect a full replacement too soon.
It should also be ported to windows, when I get some time (or somebody
does it for me...). Since mlgtk was ported to windows, this should not
be too difficult.
> Does all of this depend more people helping with O'Caml development?
This could help, certainly...
Regards,
Jacques
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jacques Garrigue Kyoto University garrigue at kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp
<A HREF=http://wwwfun.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~garrigue/>JG</A>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: LablTk not in MS Windows O'Caml 2.99?
2000-01-14 2:39 ` Jacques Garrigue
@ 2000-01-14 8:47 ` Sven LUTHER
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sven LUTHER @ 2000-01-14 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jacques Garrigue; +Cc: tkb, caml-list
On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 11:39:07AM +0900, Jacques Garrigue wrote:
>
> LablGTK is still beta, so do not expect a full replacement too soon.
> It should also be ported to windows, when I get some time (or somebody
> does it for me...). Since mlgtk was ported to windows, this should not
> be too difficult.
In the mean time, you can always give mlgtk a try, it is rumored to run on
windows (at least there are some windows stuff in the source, i didn't try
them myself, but pascal cuoq worked on it).
Friendly,
Sven LUTHER
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-01-14 16:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-01-13 0:08 LablTk not in MS Windows O'Caml 2.99? T. Kurt Bond
2000-01-14 2:39 ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-01-14 8:47 ` Sven LUTHER
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).