From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: weis Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id IAA19385 for caml-redistribution; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 08:56:36 +0100 (MET) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA26387 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 04:01:06 +0100 (MET) Received: from kurims.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp (kurims.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp [130.54.16.1]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA00727 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 04:01:02 +0100 (MET) Received: from tet.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp (tet.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp [130.54.16.184]) by kurims.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with ESMTP id MAA25719; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 12:00:58 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tet.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA10634; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:39:07 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp) To: tkb@access.mountain.net Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: LablTk not in MS Windows O'Caml 2.99? Reply-To: garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 12 Jan 2000 19:08:59 -0500" <6934-Wed12Jan2000190859-0500-tkb@access.mountain.net> References: <6934-Wed12Jan2000190859-0500-tkb@access.mountain.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.93 on Emacs 20.4 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20000114113907T.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:39:07 +0900 From: Jacques Garrigue X-Dispatcher: imput version 980905(IM100) Sender: weis From: "T. Kurt Bond" > It looks like the precompiled binaries for O'Caml 2.99 for MS Windows > don't include LablTk, although the Redhat binaries did include > LablTk. Earlier versions of O'Caml for MS Windows included O'CamlTk. LablTk is not O'CamlTk, which explains this lack. Applications written for O'CamlTk will not work with it, and you should get and compile O'CamlTK for them. I plan to include LablTk in the windows version of ocaml 3.00. > Is the TK interface eventually going to be replaced by a Gtk+ interface? > Has anyone gotten LablGtk to work on MS Windows? LablGTK is still beta, so do not expect a full replacement too soon. It should also be ported to windows, when I get some time (or somebody does it for me...). Since mlgtk was ported to windows, this should not be too difficult. > Does all of this depend more people helping with O'Caml development? This could help, certainly... Regards, Jacques --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jacques Garrigue Kyoto University garrigue at kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp JG