From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: weis Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA11688 for caml-redistribution; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 20:17:44 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA13155 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 20:16:50 +0100 (MET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA28212; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 20:16:48 +0100 (MET) Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA21158; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 20:16:47 +0100 (MET) From: Pierre Weis Message-Id: <200001141916.UAA21158@pauillac.inria.fr> Subject: Re: Byte-code specs. To: luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 20:16:47 +0100 (MET) Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <20000114094258.A11868@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> from "Sven LUTHER" at Jan 14, 0 09:42:58 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: weis > On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 10:47:27AM +0100, Xavier Leroy wrote: > > > Are there any specs for CAML bytecode? > > > > Not much. There is an old technical report (1990!) that documents > > the Caml Light virtual machine in some details: > > > > http://pauillac.inria.fr/~xleroy/publi/ZINC.ps.gz > > > > The Objective Caml virtual machine is a second iteration of the Caml > > Light VM, with some complications removed (e.g. one stack instead of > > two). However, there is no paper spec for it. > > And is there any document that gives some description of the execution costs > of different ocaml constructs ? > > Friendly, > > Sven LUTHER Difficult to tell. Have a look at the FAQ: http://pauillac.inria.fr/caml/FAQ/FAQ_EXPERT-eng.html#couts Pierre Weis INRIA, Projet Cristal, Pierre.Weis@inria.fr, http://cristal.inria.fr/~weis/