* Camlidl copyright.
@ 2000-02-22 7:41 David Brown
2000-02-22 19:51 ` Xavier Leroy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Brown @ 2000-02-22 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
I had a simple question about Camlidl. I notice that there has not
been a release since the change to the LGPL and the other license.
The LICENSE file in Camlidl gives rights to distribute the files
generated by Camlidl, but no mention is given to the runtime library
files required.
What is the intended distribution terms of these files?
Thanks,
Dave Brown
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Camlidl copyright.
2000-02-22 7:41 Camlidl copyright David Brown
@ 2000-02-22 19:51 ` Xavier Leroy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Xavier Leroy @ 2000-02-22 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Brown, caml-list
> I had a simple question about Camlidl. I notice that there has not
> been a release since the change to the LGPL and the other license.
> The LICENSE file in Camlidl gives rights to distribute the files
> generated by Camlidl, but no mention is given to the runtime library
> files required.
> What is the intended distribution terms of these files?
The same terms as those of the OCaml system, e.g. Q for the compiler
and LGPL for the runtime library. The next release of CamlIDL (if I
can find time to work on it!) will be made under those new terms.
- Xavier Leroy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-02-23 17:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-02-22 7:41 Camlidl copyright David Brown
2000-02-22 19:51 ` Xavier Leroy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).