From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: weis Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id SAA31642 for caml-redistribution@pauillac.inria.fr; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 18:03:41 +0100 (MET) Resent-Message-Id: <200002251703.SAA31642@pauillac.inria.fr> Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA04628 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 15:05:19 +0100 (MET) Received: from sunhelmet.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (sunhelmet.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.11.6]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA01400 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 15:05:17 +0100 (MET) Received: (from pfitzen@localhost) by sunhelmet.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id PAA07260 for caml-list@inria.fr; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 15:05:17 +0100 (MET) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 15:05:17 +0100 (MET) From: Juergen Pfitzenmaier Message-Id: <200002251405.PAA07260@sunhelmet.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: Portability of applications written in OCAML: C stuff Resent-From: weis@pauillac.inria.fr Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 18:03:41 +0100 Resent-To: caml-redistribution@pauillac.inria.fr Alan Schmitt wrote on Fri, 25 Feb 2000 08:37:43 +0000 > Now if you would be so kind as to explain what better solution you > have compared to makefiles, I'm all ears. I don't know what others have to say, but take a look at tools like odin and cons. pfitzen