From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: weis Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id SAA15618 for caml-redistribution@pauillac.inria.fr; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 18:18:53 +0100 (MET) Resent-Message-Id: <200003081718.SAA15618@pauillac.inria.fr> Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA22741 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:21:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr (dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.6.1]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA19253 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:21:28 +0100 (MET) Received: from lambda.u-strasbg.fr (lambda.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.75.49]) by dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA30235; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:21:20 +0100 Received: from luther by lambda.u-strasbg.fr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 12SFIL-000371-00; Tue, 07 Mar 2000 09:24:45 +0100 Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:24:45 +0100 From: Sven LUTHER To: "Matthew S. Harris" Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: Building a cross-compiling ocaml Message-ID: <20000307092445.A11953@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> Reply-To: luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr Mail-Followup-To: "Matthew S. Harris" , caml-list@inria.fr References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from mharris@cs.cornell.edu on Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 04:30:35PM -0500 Resent-From: weis@pauillac.inria.fr Resent-Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 18:18:53 +0100 Resent-To: caml-redistribution@pauillac.inria.fr On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 04:30:35PM -0500, Matthew S. Harris wrote: > I am trying to get ocaml to produce code that can be linked against > the libc of a different operating system (the University of Utah's > OSKit project, for those who may know it). The key facts are: HAs anyone been so crazy as to try to build a palm pilot version of ocaml ? or even a TI 89/92 version ? todays palm come with 8MB of memory, this is plentifull for an caml toplevel. the TI version could cause more problems (having only ~500kb memory i think). both of these computer use a 68000, or some modified version thereof, so it should be possible to reuse the m68k code that is already in ocaml. Friendly, Sven LUTHER