caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pascal Brisset <brisset@recherche.enac.fr>
To: Pierre Weis <Pierre.Weis@inria.fr>
Cc: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: Syntax for label, NEW PROPOSAL
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 09:50:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200003160850.JAA01827@sepia.recherche.enac.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20000315145830.22463@pauillac.inria.fr>

Pierre Weis writes:
> For all these reasons, I would suggest to carefully use labels into
> the standard libraries: 
> 
> -- remove labels from higher-order functional
> -- remove redundant labels: when no ambiguity can occur you need not
>    to add a label.
> -- use labels when typechecking ambiguity is evident (for instance
> when there are two or more parameters with the same type).

 Would it be possible to organize a vote for removing all labels from the
standard library ?

--Pascal Brisset



  parent reply	other threads:[~2000-03-17 10:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-03-14 16:53 Syntax for label Don Syme
2000-03-14 18:05 ` Pierre Weis
2000-03-15  3:15 ` Syntax for label, NEW PROPOSAL Jacques Garrigue
2000-03-15  6:58   ` Christophe Raffalli
2000-03-15 21:54     ` Julian Assange
2000-03-15 11:56   ` Wolfram Kahl
2000-03-15 13:58   ` Pierre Weis
2000-03-15 15:26     ` Sven LUTHER
2000-03-17  7:44       ` Pierre Weis
2000-03-15 17:04     ` John Prevost
2000-03-17 10:11       ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-03-15 17:06     ` Markus Mottl
2000-03-15 19:11     ` Remi VANICAT
2000-03-17  8:30       ` Pierre Weis
2000-03-17 14:05         ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-03-17 16:08           ` Pierre Weis
2000-03-18 10:32           ` Syntax for label, NEW SOLUTION Christophe Raffalli
2000-03-19  2:29             ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-03-20 18:25               ` Christophe Raffalli
2000-03-22  8:37                 ` Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
2000-03-21 23:29               ` John Max Skaller
2000-03-29  8:42               ` Semantic of label: The best (only ?) solution to merge both mode Christophe Raffalli
2000-03-29  9:53                 ` Christophe Raffalli
2000-03-30  9:49                   ` John Max Skaller
2000-03-30  9:39                 ` John Max Skaller
2000-03-31  4:34                   ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-04-01  1:53                     ` John Max Skaller
2000-04-02 19:24                     ` Christophe Raffalli
2000-04-04  5:50                       ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-04-03  7:57                     ` backward compatibility Christophe Raffalli
2000-03-15 21:30     ` Syntax for label, NEW PROPOSAL John Max Skaller
2000-03-16  2:55     ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-03-17 15:13       ` Pierre Weis
2000-03-17 17:33         ` Wolfram Kahl
2000-03-18 11:59         ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-03-21 16:51       ` Pascal Brisset
2000-03-23 11:14         ` Nicolas barnier
2000-03-24  9:54           ` labels & ocaml 3 & co David Mentré
2000-03-24 12:19             ` David Mentré
2000-03-21 22:22       ` Unsigned integers? John Max Skaller
2000-03-22 16:22         ` Sven LUTHER
2000-03-23  2:08           ` Max Skaller
2000-03-23  7:50             ` Sven LUTHER
2000-03-24  2:50             ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-03-24 15:59               ` Xavier Leroy
2000-03-25  4:03               ` John Max Skaller
2000-03-24 14:50             ` Xavier Leroy
2000-03-22 17:05         ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2000-03-22 19:10           ` Markus Mottl
2000-03-23  2:41           ` Max Skaller
2000-03-22 19:47         ` Xavier Leroy
2000-03-23 12:55           ` John Max Skaller
2000-03-16  8:50     ` Pascal Brisset [this message]
2000-03-17 11:15       ` Syntax for label, NEW PROPOSAL Sven LUTHER
2000-03-18  0:04     ` Syntax for label, ANOTHER " Steven Thomson
2000-03-15 20:39   ` Syntax for label (and more) Xavier Leroy
2000-03-17 10:03     ` Christian RINDERKNECHT
2000-03-17 17:19       ` Christophe Raffalli
2000-03-21  1:29     ` Markus Mottl
2000-03-15 20:40 Syntax for label, NEW PROPOSAL Don Syme
2000-03-17  9:48 ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-03-17 17:34   ` Dave Mason
2000-03-18  0:26     ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-03-23 13:07       ` Sven LUTHER
2000-03-17 17:03 Don Syme
2000-03-17 19:24 ` John Prevost
2000-03-17 21:33 Damien Doligez
2000-03-18 21:07 ` Frank Atanassow
2000-03-18 22:40 ` John Prevost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200003160850.JAA01827@sepia.recherche.enac.fr \
    --to=brisset@recherche.enac.fr \
    --cc=Pierre.Weis@inria.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).