From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: weis
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id BAA15591 for caml-redistribution@pauillac.inria.fr; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 01:33:17 +0200 (MET DST)
Resent-Message-Id: <200004092333.BAA15591@pauillac.inria.fr>
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA29131 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 04:42:45 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from ftp.filemaker.com (ftp.filemaker.com [192.35.50.27])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA07746
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 04:42:43 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from imap.filemaker.com (imap.filemaker.com [17.184.4.101])
	by ftp.filemaker.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id TAA06756
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 19:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [17.184.5.111] ([17.184.5.111])
	by imap.filemaker.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id TAA05978
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 6 Apr 2000 19:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200004070242.TAA05978@imap.filemaker.com>
Subject: Re: to have labels or not
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 19:44:12 -0700
x-sender: hao-yang_wang@mail.filemaker.com
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, January 22, 1998
From: Hao-yang Wang <hao-yang_wang@filemaker.com>
cc: <caml-list@inria.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Resent-From: weis@pauillac.inria.fr
Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 01:33:17 +0200
Resent-To: caml-redistribution@pauillac.inria.fr

On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Brian Rogoff wrote:
>John Skaller already answered your points, and anyways since having two
>libraries is in no way an elegant solution I'll leave it alone. I still 
>think that having two modes makes it harder to explain OCaml and much 
>harder for me to promote it in industry to my colleagues, which is my main 
>concern. 

Well, there have already been lots of compilers with two modes, for C and 
C++. Both C and C++ are widely accepted in industry.

Cheers,
Hao-yang Wang