From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id PAA09028 for caml-red; Sat, 25 Nov 2000 15:36:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA30962 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 14:11:06 +0100 (MET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id eANDB5114417 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 14:11:05 +0100 (MET) Received: (from xleroy@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA21221; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 14:11:05 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 14:11:05 +0100 From: Xavier Leroy To: Christian Lindig , Caml Mailing List Subject: Re: mysterious signature mismatch Message-ID: <20001123141105.B13264@pauillac.inria.fr> References: <20001115103359.C13992@lakeland.eecs.harvard.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20001115103359.C13992@lakeland.eecs.harvard.edu>; from lindig@eecs.harvard.edu on Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 10:33:59AM -0500 Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr > The following code is rejected by the compiler with a signature > mismatch error. However, the signature below is the same the one > inferred by the compiler. Bug or feature? It is a bug in OCaml 3.00, which is fixed in the current working sources. - Xavier Leroy