From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA14312 for caml-red; Fri, 26 Jan 2001 22:11:52 +0100 (MET) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA08439 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 17:28:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailgw1.fhg.de (mailgw1.fhg.de [153.96.1.2]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f0PGSPH22235 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 17:28:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from ilt.fhg.de (ilt.ilt.fhg.de [153.96.180.2]) by mailgw1.fhg.de (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0PGSMH28661 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 17:28:23 +0100 (MET) Received: from eent230 (eelta136.llt.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.47.136]) by ilt.fhg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA08697 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 17:28:20 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200101251628.RAA08697@ilt.fhg.de> From: wester@ilt.fhg.de To: caml-list@inria.fr Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 17:28:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: LablTk Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01d) Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr Hi, I would like to use LablTk together with Bigarrays in the toplevel. Can I make my own toplevel with both modules linked in? I know how to make it for Bigarrays alone and I know that labltk.exe (Windows) is the toplevel with LablTk already linked in. But I couldn't figure out how to make a toplevel with both Bigarrays and LablTk. Besides this I couldn't find information about the modules Imagebitmap and Imagephoto which might be interesting for me. I have Ousterhouts Tcl/Tk book but couldn't find anything about this two modules. I'have read that float arrays aren't boxed. Does this also hold for integers? Considering speed are Bigarrays preferable? I would be very appreciative for any answers to my questions. I'm working on a project where I have to develop software for image processing and pattern recognition. I considered to make this in C++ or Java because I'm quite familiar with these languages and graphical output can quite easily be done with both. On the other hand I like OCaml's toplevel because it makes rapid prototyping very easy and I also would like to learn OCaml in order to extend my programming skills. But the project has to be executed succesfully, so I'm still undecided. Thank you in advance. With kind regards. Rolf Wester ------------------------------------- Rolf Wester wester@ilt.fhg.de