From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA27715 for caml-red; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:52:15 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA01609 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:55:34 +0100 (MET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f16FtUL14086; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:55:30 +0100 (MET) Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA08776; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:55:30 +0100 (MET) From: Pierre Weis Message-Id: <200102061555.QAA08776@pauillac.inria.fr> Subject: Re: compilation of lablgl examples. In-Reply-To: <3A7EE5C5.B76F2481@ozemail.com.au> from John Max Skaller at "Feb 6, 101 04:41:25 am" To: skaller@ozemail.com.au (John Max Skaller) Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:55:30 +0100 (MET) Cc: caml-list@inria.fr X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr [...] > pet project over to them ... but the use of standard variant > constructors is extremely heavy, and I'm having trouble > coming to terms with the need to virtually rewrite my > entire source. > > -- > John (Max) Skaller, mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au > 10/1 Toxteth Rd Glebe NSW 2037 Australia voice: 61-2-9660-0850 > checkout Vyper http://Vyper.sourceforge.net > download Interscript http://Interscript.sourceforge.net Could you explain a bit why ``the use of standard variant constructors is extremely heavy'' (I thought it was on the contrary extremely light and elegant!) ? Best regards, Pierre Weis INRIA, Projet Cristal, Pierre.Weis@inria.fr, http://pauillac.inria.fr/~weis/