From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id AAA32521 for caml-red; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 00:24:59 +0100 (MET)
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA10462 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 22:34:57 +0100 (MET)
Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f17LYt900721;
	Wed, 7 Feb 2001 22:34:55 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA02268; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 22:34:54 +0100 (MET)
From: Pierre Weis <Pierre.Weis@inria.fr>
Message-Id: <200102072134.WAA02268@pauillac.inria.fr>
Subject: Re: Unbound type constructor
In-Reply-To: <20010206143921.A18400@jean> from "leary@nwlink.com" at "Feb 6, 101 02:39:21 pm"
To: leary@nwlink.com
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 22:34:54 +0100 (MET)
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr

> If the list management is/can be centralized, why not have 2 or 3 people doing the moderation?  
> 
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 05:35:02PM +0100, Pierre Weis wrote:
> > If this treatment of the list is considered harmful and not
> > desirable, we can turn the list into some other mode, maybe a
> > completely free (non-moderated) mode ...

Good idea. Any volunteers to write or install the necessary software,
and also volunteers to manage the list ?

Best regards,

Pierre Weis

INRIA, Projet Cristal, Pierre.Weis@inria.fr, http://pauillac.inria.fr/~weis/