From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA05844 for caml-red; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:47:43 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA28613 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:47:52 +0100 (MET) Received: from cantina.students.cs.unibo.it (cantina.students.cs.unibo.it [130.136.3.110]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f198lqP27444 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:47:52 +0100 (MET) Received: from pagadebit.students.cs.unibo.it (root@pagadebit.students.cs.unibo.it [130.136.3.115]) by cantina.students.cs.unibo.it (8.11.1/8.11.1/Debian 8.11.0-6) with ESMTP id f198lpm22543 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:47:51 +0100 Received: (from sacerdot@localhost) by pagadebit.students.cs.unibo.it (8.11.1/8.11.1/Debian 8.11.0-6) id f198lp209555 for caml-list@inria.fr; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:47:51 +0100 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:47:51 +0100 From: Claudio Sacerdoti Coen To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: OCaml's long range graphical direction? Message-ID: <20010209094751.A9524@students.cs.unibo.it> References: <20010206102842.A27059@pauillac.inria.fr> <20010206191902.B11976@lambda.u-strasbg.fr> <20010208105941X.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <20010208085555.F22127@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i In-Reply-To: <20010208085555.F22127@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>; from luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr on Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 08:55:55AM +0100 X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Organization: Department of computer science, University of Bologna, Eurpean Union Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 08:55:55 +0100, Sven wrote: > Who is using lablgtk and who is still using mlgtk ? Project HELM in Bologna was using mlgtk and then moved to lablgtk. The reasons are: 1. lablgtk is a complete binding, while mlgtk is (was?) not and we had to add some missing parts 2. the OO layer of lablgtk is a bit disappointing at the beginning, but after a while it appears to be more high-level and so better to use 3. the two binding are equally undocumented This said, I still miss of mlgtk 1. the easy layer for very rapid prototyping 2. writing a new binding was easier Cheers, C.S.C. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Real name: Claudio Sacerdoti Coen Graduate Computer Science Student at University of Bologna Now at INRIA (Sophia-Antipolis, France) E-mail: sacerdot@cs.unibo.it http://caristudenti.cs.unibo.it/~sacerdot ----------------------------------------------------------------