From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA14667 for caml-red; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 16:58:33 +0100 (MET) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA32472 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:01:11 +0100 (MET) Received: from dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr (dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.6.1]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f19A1BL22059 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:01:11 +0100 (MET) Received: from lambda.u-strasbg.fr (lambda.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.90.63]) by dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA31013; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:00:08 +0100 Received: from luther by lambda.u-strasbg.fr with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14RALz-00016M-00; Fri, 09 Feb 2001 11:00:35 +0100 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:00:35 +0100 To: Claudio Sacerdoti Coen Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: OCaml's long range graphical direction? Message-ID: <20010209110035.A4184@lambda.u-strasbg.fr> References: <20010206102842.A27059@pauillac.inria.fr> <20010206191902.B11976@lambda.u-strasbg.fr> <20010208105941X.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <20010208085555.F22127@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> <20010209094751.A9524@students.cs.unibo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i In-Reply-To: <20010209094751.A9524@students.cs.unibo.it>; from sacerdot@students.cs.unibo.it on Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 09:47:51AM +0100 From: Sven LUTHER Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 09:47:51AM +0100, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 08:55:55 +0100, Sven wrote: > > Who is using lablgtk and who is still using mlgtk ? > > Project HELM in Bologna was using mlgtk and then moved to lablgtk. > The reasons are: > > 1. lablgtk is a complete binding, while mlgtk is (was?) not and we > had to add some missing parts Due to lack of time ... and also some people wrote bindings but never contributed them back to us :((( > 2. the OO layer of lablgtk is a bit disappointing at the beginning, > but after a while it appears to be more high-level and so > better to use > 3. the two binding are equally undocumented > > This said, I still miss of mlgtk > > 1. the easy layer for very rapid prototyping Well, i think it could easily be ported, it is not a huge file after all. > 2. writing a new binding was easier This comes from 2. before. Friendly, Sven Luther