From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA04271 for caml-red; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:54:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA25123 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:23:01 +0100 (MET) Received: from verdot.inria.fr (verdot.inria.fr [128.93.11.7]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f1BJN0n24662; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:23:00 +0100 (MET) Received: (from ddr@localhost) by verdot.inria.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA07728; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:23:00 +0100 Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:23:00 +0100 From: Daniel de Rauglaudre To: Markus Mottl Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: R: Consortium Caml Message-ID: <20010211202300.L5787@verdot.inria.fr> References: <000201c090f4$0f5013a0$18ab6ed4@alex> <20010208014519.A13836@miss.wu-wien.ac.at> <20010209154550.7ba53a91.fleutotf@esiee.fr> <20010209172223.A28842@miss.wu-wien.ac.at> <20010210205617.G16265@verdot.inria.fr> <20010211130554.A16614@miss.wu-wien.ac.at> <20010211154936.C32434@verdot.inria.fr> <20010211193649.A6572@miss.wu-wien.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0us In-Reply-To: <20010211193649.A6572@miss.wu-wien.ac.at>; from mottl@miss.wu-wien.ac.at on Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 07:36:49PM +0100 Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr Hi, On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 07:36:49PM +0100, Markus Mottl wrote: > I *do* think that OCaml very badly needs additional resources to give it > the final touch to "conquer the world", but from a business point of view, > I am in doubt that the scheme as proposed stands a high chance of success. Ok. I see your long long message. You seem to know very well how the market work. (this is not ironic, just a constatation.) What do you propose? A bigger fee? Other thing than a Consortium? Think more about it before deciding something else? -- Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/